Often, yes. Data broker and people-search records are usually removable, though they are republished frequently enough that removal has to be maintained rather than done once. Impersonation accounts and synthetic media come down through platform processes when filed correctly. Inaccurate information can frequently be corrected at the source, which is more durable than suppression. Where something is accurate and lawfully published, the work becomes correction and context rather than removal — and we will tell you which category yours falls into on the first call, so you know what you are buying.
Usually one to two weeks depending on scope and how many parties are involved. Monitoring begins immediately if you want it running while the assessment is prepared.
Not from us. We publish no client names and seek no testimonials. Where work involves contacting third parties we agree in advance how we identify ourselves, and we will not misrepresent who we act for.
Both, and frequently both at once — an executive's exposure and their organisation's record are rarely separable in practice.
Partly new and partly not. Measuring what the assistants say about you is genuinely new, genuinely measurable, and almost nobody does it. Influencing those answers draws on established practice — accurate sources, consistent corroboration, clear structure. We are explicit about which part is which rather than selling the whole thing as novel.
It depends on scope, the number of parties, and whether monitoring is ongoing. We quote after the first conversation, not before, because quoting before we know what we are looking at would be a guess.
Yes. Monitoring goes live within the hour and you will have the spread mapped, the origin identified and a set of options the same day. See crisis response for how the first day runs.
Then we will tell you that, and you will have a documented baseline and no reason to spend further. That happens, and it is a good outcome.